[peeters]

I mean I don't know if I'm more impressed by their level of detail from a $10 billion telescope or your level of detail from a consumer-grade telescope!

[xcv123]

The James Webb image shows a level of detail we have never seen before. Hundreds of galaxies in the background that are invisible on the consumer grade telescope.

Here's the full resolution image:

https://www.esa.int/var/esa/storage/images/esa_multimedia/im...

[peeters]

Oh, don't get me wrong, I am absolutely astounded by the JWST's level of detail and am in awe of the pictures it takes. And they are obviously far more detailed than the OP's. I also think it was a worthy expense. I was just noting that my awe of both is comparable when you normalize for cost!

[stoobs]

I'm quietly chomping at the bit for a Webb full deepfield survey rather than the hint of it we saw in 2022...

[peeters]

If this post is to be believed, a full deepfield survey would take four thousand to fourty thousand years. https://www.reddit.com/r/jameswebb/comments/wrwsfc/how_long_...

[cconstantine]

Thanks, but it if you look closely you'll see that the Webb image has almost an image worth of detail within each pixel of my image.

[notdang]

Once in a while, I have the impulse to buy the equipment to make these kinds of photos, then I check the price (at least 4k USD), realize I am not from US and cool down tell next time.

It's consumer level, but not cheap at all.

[spenczar5]

Its all relative, right? The cost is about a millionth of the JWST image. A millionth!

[estebank]

At that price difference it's silly to not buy the gear! Right? Right?