[jjfoooo6]

I think it's relatively unlikely that having an agent write graph queries will outperform vector search against graph information outputted into text and then transformed into vectors.

The related issue that I think is being conflated in this thread is that even if your goal was to directly support graph queries, you could accomplish this with a vanilla database much easier than running a specialized graph db

[gaogao]

Outperform in what way? There's some distinct things it already does better on like multi-hop and aggregate reasoning than a similarity context window dump. In general, tool-assisted, of which KG querying is one tool, does pretty good on the benchmarks and many of the LLM chats cutting over to it as the default.

> if your goal was to directly support graph queries, you could accomplish this with a vanilla database much easier than running a specialized graph db

Postgres and MySQL do have pretty reasonable graph query extensions/features. If by easier, you mean effort to get up a MVP, I'd agree, but I'm a bit more dubious on the scale up, as you'd probably get something like Facebook and Tao.