Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by input_sh 778 days ago
OSI would: https://opensource.org/license/apache-2-0

Edit: I'm wrong, see below.
4 comments
255kb 778 days ago
It's Apache 2.0 + custom clauses excluding any commercial/for-profit usage.
link
input_sh 778 days ago
My mistake, I should've paid more attention.
link
mhitza 778 days ago
The Apache License is, however the additional terms the author has made to the license make it not open source; because the additional terms supersede the Apache License.

It looks like Apache Licensed but its the BSL (ElasticSearch, Redis, Mongodb license path) in disguise.

Author should have used AGPL if he wanted to make a product that isn't easily/eagerly SaaSified.

link
ssddanbrown 778 days ago
I've added extra explanation in a discussion I've opened on the project: https://github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/discussions/3
link
megadal 778 days ago
It probably was open source before the license was modified to prevent commercial use, which is not open source.
link