|
|
|
|
|
by ShamelessC
780 days ago
|
|
Didn’t the media cover this already over and over since ChatGPT’s inception? Not that it isn’t important but to imply it is a new revelation seems sensationalist. > While inaccurate information may be tolerable when a student uses ChatGPT to help him with their homework, it is unacceptable when it comes to information about individuals. I don’t even understand this part. Why would inaccurate information be at all acceptable for homework? You need accurate information there just as much as with people. In fact there’s probably a good deal of overlap. This article is bad. |
|
This is not “the media”. noyb isn’t reporting on what other people did, they are informing us of what they just did.
> Not that it isn’t important but to imply it is a new revelation seems sensationalist.
The article isn’t about the failings of ChatGPT, it’s about a specific legal complaint being made.
> Why would inaccurate information be at all acceptable for homework?
It’s acceptable in a legal sense, you get a bad grade and that’s that. But falsehoods about a particular individual on a popular resource could be quite damaging and are against EU law.
> This article is bad.
Rather, you completely misunderstood it.