|
|
|
|
|
by edanm
785 days ago
|
|
This attitude is why the web won, IMO. When it comes to native apps, in the 2000s, this was the common attitude of users. But it's much harder to implement from a business perspective! Both in terms of business models, and in terms of dev time - having a bunch of possibly-incompatible versions lying around is a lot of overhead. On the web, where most technical users understood this is technically impossible, they were willing to allow businesses to act differently, keep the software always-updated, and charge per usage. And since that's much easier and more lucrative for companies, they all switched to that. (Now everyone kind of accepts that model, which is why today's Photoshop works via subscription, but the "damage" was done and the web won.) |
|