|
|
|
|
|
by wpietri
5136 days ago
|
|
It may be hard to reach you way up on your high horse there, but I don't think a "these photos are mine, all mine" disclaimer would have done a ton for him. Take Candice as an example. She's crazier than a bucket of ferrets on meth. Even normal users don't read much of the text on websites; look at any of Jakob Nielsen's eye-tracking studies. People who are task-focused (e.g., find an image for their site they're rushing to get up) read even less. Given that, how much do you think Candice will read? And once it's on another site, people will start stealing it from there too. Coughpinterestcough. So as someone who also tries to look at how things work, I don't think he did anything wrong here. Suddenly everybody's a publisher, and it's going to take a while to teach them about copyright. This is part of the education process. |
|
"She's crazier than a bucket of ferrets on meth"... love it.
"how much do you think Candice will read?" A bucket of ferrets on meth... none. But that was not the only place the he found the photo.
"and it's going to take a while to teach them about copyright. This is part of the education process."... teaching, that is something that I can agree with. On the other side, in principle I cannot agree with Goya's picture "La letra con sangre entra" (Teaching by punishment, or spare the rod and spoil the child) http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:La_letra_con_sangre_e...
If I am in a high horse, then then that kind of "teaching" is egocentric and self entitlement.