|
|
|
|
|
|
by lijok
784 days ago
|
|
|
If anything Terraform will get reinvigorated. I'd bet IBM will reverse the license change by the end of the year. > This leads me to my first concern, IBM has a conflict of interest. IBM has a cloud offering, admittedly with a 1.8% market share. Why would they want to keep developing tools that frankly benefit their competitors more than them? Because they'll make bank off of Hashicorp Cloud Platform. > Another option is to ‘go native,’ with each of the big three hyperscalers offering its dedicated options: Cloud Formation with AWS, Bicep with Azure, and Config Controller in Google Cloud. Not an option. People manage way, way more than just AWS, Azure and GCP with Terraform. GitHub, Cloudflare, Tailscale, etc ... It's an interesting time for Hashistack for sure, but I don't think the industry is prepared to move away from the tooling. |
|
|
I’m curious what you think IBM will do differently to make bank, considering Hashicorp failed to make bank from their cloud platform offerings.