|
|
|
|
|
by IvanAchlaqullah
778 days ago
|
|
Or refuse to implement IPv6. (At least here in Indonesia with only 14% adoption rate) Why? Because for residential user that want low latency internet & low packet drop (CGNAT increase both), ISP can charge "business price" for dedicated IPv4 that aren't behind CGNAT. With IPv6, CGNAT is not needed. Considering ISP/Telco in here is very scummy (they even perform MITM to inject ads, use Class 0 message / AMBER Alert for ads, etc.) I won't be surprised if that's the only reason why they didn't rolled out IPv6. |
|