|
|
|
|
|
|
by smolder
790 days ago
|
|
|
I wouldn't go so far as to call humans robots, and I don't think compelling corporations to give out access to LLMs is reasonable, frankly. I do agree with you as far as the idea that people deserve a right to privacy that extends to a local and personal digital space. I would even say we should have a right to privacy in our digital communications, with very specific exceptions, i.e. direct suspicion of crime and court approval to spy. IMO the spirit of the fourth amendment to the US Constitution was to protect these things. It states we should be "secure in" our "papers and effects". I think the founders realized that, in the same sense you're hitting upon, peoples minds spill out of their bodies somewhat. A person might depend on a notebook as an extension of their memory, for example, and they shouldn't have to worry about it being arbitrarily seized or searched. Yet any interaction we have with modern technologies we depend on seems subject to surveillance, and the tech is all as-a-service and revokable. Unfortunately, the spirit of the 4th amendment looks be lost today, as new surveillance capabilities are being realized. |
|
|