[PaulHoule]

Ranker ~is~ a top 1k site.

Personally I've looked over the data for a number of successes and failures and I don't believe the conventional story about Panda.

Adding the data in this article to everything else I know about Ranker just confirms my model of what works and what doesn't.

[nowarninglabel]

No, they are not, at least not according to major reporters of such stats. What measure are you pointing to in order to indicate they are a top 1k site?

[PaulHoule]

they ranked at #992 in Quantcast last week; they're got the Quantcast tracking code too, so the traffic numbers aren't crazy