|
|
|
|
|
by at_a_remove
780 days ago
|
|
You remember ... wrongly. It's just another particle accelerator, its intention was not to produce micro black holes for study. You shouldn't use "theory" when it comes to science unless you know what that means. Gravity is a "theory." "Theory" means that it has a working model, comes with a ton of observational evidence in line with predictions, and it has yet to be replaced by anything better. Outside of math, nothing is ever proven. Any leading scientific theory is, at best, "yet to be disproven." And it stays in the lead until something better comes along: more accurate, extending over a greater domain, etc. Hawking radiation has yet to be observed. And if you're worried about micro black holes, well, even an iron atom has a non-zero chance of tunneling to a micro black hole state. No collider needed. Cyc isn't secretive, it's proprietary, the way the Microsoft codebase is, the Adobe codebase is, and so on. |
|