|
|
|
|
|
by mechanical_fish
5146 days ago
|
|
So it is. Go find their patents and read them. Deduce what you can. The spokesman is under no obligation, legal or otherwise, to make this easier than necessary. That is how the game is played. Nor is he a lawyer, or foolish enough to issue an off-the-cuff statement that undercuts the work of the actual team that has crafted the wording of the patents. |
|
I was trying to address kondro's obvious confusion about mikeknoop's point, not pass judgement on anyone in the article.