|
|
|
|
|
by lanza
790 days ago
|
|
> Mostly the `final` keyword serves as a compile-time assertion. The compiler (sometimes linker) is perfectly capable of seeing that a class has no derived classes That's incorrect. The optimizer has to assume everything escapes the current optimization unit unless explicitly told otherwise. It needs explicit guarantees about the visibility to figure out the extent of the derivations allowed. |
|