|
|
|
|
|
by toyg
785 days ago
|
|
I agree with your view, but if we put down our old greybeard hats for a minute - isn't it nice to see a new generation of people potentially getting excited about RSS? The parent comment is clearly by an optimistic youngster, who has just discovered an awesome technology that (he thinks) could change the world. And maybe it can! Just because we've seen it beaten once (well, a few times), it doesn't mean it's dead, and maybe, just maybe, there is something we can't see that will be the real RSS killer app. Take podcasting - when RSS was first devised, nobody thought of such a use-case; it just happened that the media-attachment hacks tacked on top of it merged, at a particular time and place, with some other emerging tech (the iPod), creating something so good that it's still around. |
|
https://www.w3.org/PICS/
The use as parential control is clutter to me. The referring to content selection as filtering was a terrible idea.
The content labels can exist on a different website, they can live in the html document and there is an rss element specifically for it.
You make up your own rating label and put a score behind it. There was an example for example that rated by canadiannes
https://www.w3.org/TR/REC-PICS-labels/#Example
As usual they spend a lot of words explaining something simple.
In its almost most simple form:
(PICS-1.1 "http://www.example.org/ratingservice" label for "http://www.example.com/foobar" rating (javascript 5 php 4 mysql 6 bloomfilter 10))
Looks a lot like hand crafted weights to me. If widely adopted you could make a fascinating tag cloud from your 100k rss subscriptions.