|
|
|
|
|
by Draiken
790 days ago
|
|
Isn't the fact that they're the market leader in what they do proof enough?
Would they have created/found this cash cow if they were a traditional company? People try to poke holes in their ways, yet they have made legendary games, amazing hardware and absolutely dominate the game distribution market. Basically all of their competitors use the traditional management style. What other evidence would you expect? |
|
Going forward: Someone else created Counter Strike, someone else created DoTA, someone else created Portal, someone else created Team Fortress, someone else create Left 4 Dead. Valve took these projects on and polished them, but they didn't really create something new until Artifact - which failed in the market.
What you also don't see is all the unannounced projects that went nowhere, because that's what you get when people just get to play around on their own, indefinitely.