|
I misread your original comment, but I don’t think replacing the management company is any easier than purchasing the freehold, aside from capital considerations. The right exists in principle, but 50% of flats (as I understand it, all of them, including flats that are not demised under lease, but under AST from the freeholder, and who do not form part of the quota) must agree to form a management company before it can take effect. > If I own a lease and then rent it out on an AST I want to reduce my costs to increase my profits. In a demand-skewed market you will just pass the higher cost on in rent; it’s not going to make it any less likely that you manage to let it out. Furthermore, even contacting the owners of sublet flats, let alone convincing them they should spend money and endure potential disruption, can be difficult, making it hard to reach the threshold. In a small block it might be easy, in a high-rise with 200 apartments, it’s trickier. |
In a demand skewed market you'll charge the same regardless.
Two people owning identical flats, one with a 90% mortgage at 5%, one with no mortgage at all, will charge exactly the same rent.
Costs don't come into the rent charged, this is a lie perpetrated by landlords who want tax breaks.