|
|
|
|
|
by zcam
5141 days ago
|
|
Also emacs provides an extensive platform with tons of modes to support pretty much anything you can throw at it, works in a terminal if needed, has an abstraction over files (buffers), debuggers, easy modes for vi/cua users, can connect to browser instance if needed and tons more. Building a lighttable mode or even several small modes (libraries vs framework) for emacs would make more sense. It is going to require a huge effort to duplicate a fraction of what it provides already. But from a marketing point of view it is/was probably smarter to show eye candy to attract funding, but I am not sure it is the best route in the long run. |
|
Though, is LightTable the best/easiest way to get that? I don't know, it may be easier to render emacs buffers into a webkit view, it may also not be.