|
|
|
|
|
|
by abetusk
794 days ago
|
|
|
You're not addressing the core issue that I brought up. They use the term "open source" inappropriately. They could have said "fair licensing terms" but instead chose to use "open source". If their licensing terms are as good for 99% of user, then they should say "fair licensing terms that are as good as open source for 99% of users", not that they're open source. |
|
|