[mananaysiempre]

Not really that either, if we assume that “open weight” means something similar to the standard meaning of “open source”—section 2 of the license discriminates against some users, and the entirety of the AUP against some uses, in contravention of FSD #0 (“The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose”) as well as DFSG #5&6 = OSD #5&6 (“No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups” and “... Fields of Endeavor”, the text under those titles is identical in both cases). Section 7 of the license is a choice of jurisdiction, which (in addition to being void in many places) I believe was considered to be against or at least skirting the DFSG in other licenses. At best it’s weight-available and redistributable.

[blackeyeblitzar]

Those are all great points and these companies need to really be called out for open washing

[amitport]

It's a good balance IMHO. I appreciate what they have released.

[ikurei]

I appreciate it too, and they're of course going to call it "open weights", but I reckon we (the technically informed public) should call it "weights-available".