[015a]

Oh I didn't necessarily mean the code, at least in the first example; you have to click the "Preview" button to see what the code results in, but its a rather bad 404 page, using broken english, phrases that generally wouldn't/shouldn't appear on a 404 page ("this page is broken"), a button that fully disappears rather than correctly entering a hover state, and a button that generally would never appear on a 404 page ("Try Again").

Like, I don't mean to be, well, mean about this; but I'm struggling not to be so here it is: I find it difficult to believe that any human with an ounce of the craft in their bones could have created that. So my conclusion was AI, because that is the more kind of two conclusions I could draw. The authors responding to my original comment by stating that no AI was used in the production of these assets, unfortunately, leaves only the other conclusion.

[santush]

hi 015a, thank you for the comments. I admit that there are some improvment must need and we will continue improve it.

our teams works several months for the components and you are here to say it using AI.Its easy to say that so it using AI. Please try to build 700+ components with HTML, REACT and framework of TailwindCSS and Bootstrap. With light and dark version.

let me know which AI do that and give me the link I will follow next time.