[mlyle]

> I don't think that's quite how it worked.

I think he described exactly what you did (in fewer words) in the second half of his post. ("Your typical color TV ..."

The first half discusses that some projection screens had 3 different tubes. ("Very few broadcast TVs ...")

Either that or he edited his post.

[abstractbeliefs]

My objection is:

> Your typical color TV effectively created "pixels" by their use of shadow masks and three separate beams.

It's true that almost all colour TVs are pixelated and have shadow masks and three separate beams, but it's got the cause and consequence the wrong way around.

The pixels are created by the phosphor dots, not the mask/tube design. It's possible to use this design without three tubes or the screen, strictly, but a consequence of this design suggests the optional addition of a shadow mask and additional tubes as a natural, later progression for improved performance.

[mlyle]

> It's possible to use this design without three tubes or the screen, strictly,

Without shadow masks or an aperture grille seems pretty dang hard. Even ignoring the alignment concerns, it requires a much, much higher bandwidth.

The shadow mask and aperture grille approaches were the only approaches that ever really worked for color CRTs.

Phosphors and some kind of masking is how you make different colors on a single tube. Indeed, the shadow mask or aperture grille was offset 3 times and used to etch for the phosphor coatings in most manufacturing processes.

> l addition of a shadow mask and additional tubes as a natural, later progression for improved performance.

There's just one tube-- multiple guns/beams, though.