[floor_]

I don't know if I would call a math library that uses templates so liberally "high performance". High performance also includes compile time in my opinion.

[murderfs]

Your opinion is wrong.

[anonfordays]

I get the template hate, they take a while to wrap your head around and can create cryptic bugs. Nonetheless they can be extremely powerful and enable performance and reduced complexity by being a bit complex upfront.

[oivey]

Yeah. Avoiding templates almost certainly leads to losing run time performance. The compile time is a drop in the bucket.

[392]

Are there any benchmarks to show it would be noticeably faster to compile with a non-templated design?