|
|
|
|
|
|
by akorotkov
798 days ago
|
|
|
Sure, there are downsides.
1. The replay of WAL records becomes somewhat more CPU-expensive. But at the same time, OrioleDB can do that in parallel.
2. Replace becomes not the file-level equivalent of primary. Thus, you, for instance, can't continue file-level incremental backup started taken from the primary with the replica.
Nevertheless, I strongly believe that row-level WAL is a great win on average, and opens brilliant perspectives for further developments. |
|
|