Imagine walking into a town square. There are the highest resolution cameras mounted every few feet that take a constant stream of input. People scoff at the idea that you might want less of them.
You fail to make a point here but I assume you are implying this is bad.
The question would then be, why is it bad? Would you accept that it is permissable to film a public scene in general? If so, and this is not a rhetorical question, what is the difference?
That difference may cross a line of privacy when considering what a reasonably assumable degree of scrutiny is expected in public.
That is not a simple question and the law may have a different answer to public opinion which may be different again to what is best for society.
The question would then be, why is it bad? Would you accept that it is permissable to film a public scene in general? If so, and this is not a rhetorical question, what is the difference?
That difference may cross a line of privacy when considering what a reasonably assumable degree of scrutiny is expected in public.
That is not a simple question and the law may have a different answer to public opinion which may be different again to what is best for society.