|
|
|
|
|
by samjs
789 days ago
|
|
Hey cratermoon, Oso CTO here. I'm probably too close to it, so I'm not following: "a great many of the problems they are solving exist because of RBAC" Oso supports authorization using any combination of RBAC/ReBAC/ABAC you want. If anything, I would say that sticking with RBAC is the "easy way" to do it, but you push the complexity of managing it onto your end users (the ones who need to administer it). Whereas building authorization that uses attributes like you describe requires more implementation work, but can make the experience easier for users. Am I understanding you correctly? |
|