|
|
|
|
|
by Kranar
798 days ago
|
|
Of course the Average Joe has disadvantages compared to a hedge fund or people who are experts in a field and spend the bulk of their life dedicated to some aspect that the Average Joe is not dedicated towards. If Average Joe wants returns comparable to these hedge funds, then they should stop trying to time to market and instead stick to diversified ETFs and stop worrying about millisecond differences in the stock market. Believe it or not, if Average Joe does that they can actually beat most hedge funds over a long time horizon [1]. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/16/warren-buffett-won-2-point-2... |
|
No, expertise is not the difference. If you're a private person with 100 years experience in trading, you still can't do HFT. You need to be an instutition, have lots of capital to invest in servers, software development maintainance etc. As a private person I think you don't even get access to the API.
"Of course whoever has more capital has advantages in the market"? Of course they do, but I don't think "of course they should".
For this discussion, that funds don't beat the market average over a long term is irrelevant. Why not say "who cares you get more latency than the other bank, if you want money just invest in S&P500 and long term you'll beat them". But you don't apply that to banks against banks, only to banks against Joe. Why?