|
|
|
|
|
by pandora-health
801 days ago
|
|
Regarding gas condensing boilers and their efficiency, the notion of them achieving over 100% efficiency, as measured by the Lower Heating Value (LHV) of the fuel, really showcases the value of recapturing latent heat. When we burn natural gas, besides generating heat, water vapor is produced as a byproduct. Traditional boilers expel this vapor and its associated latent heat through the flue, wasting a significant portion of energy. Condensing boilers, however, are designed to cool the exhaust gases to a point where the water vapor condenses back into liquid, reclaiming that latent heat. This process effectively allows the system to extract more heat from the combustion than the calorific value of the gas would suggest possible, if you only consider the LHV, which excludes the heat contained in the steam. Consequently, when this extra captured heat is added to the overall heat output, it can push the efficiency of the boiler beyond 100% using LHV calculations. |
|
At least in the US (not sure where you are), combustion boiler/furnace efficiency is required to be calculated using the HHV, which includes the heat of vaporization, not the LHV. The result is that even the highest efficiency condensing combustion heating systems all have rated efficiencies below 100%, which makes sense thermodynamically.
It seems that the standard in Europe is to instead calculate efficiency using LHV, resulting in the efficiency rating over 100% for condensing boiler. > 100% doesn't make sense thermodynamically, but is good enough for comparing when the same calculation is used.
Either way, it should be made more clear in the UI that it is using LHV.