Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tims33 797 days ago
Funny. In with the roar of multiple paragraphs spent explaining all the reasons this spot will be the next big one. And then out with a quick whimper that the scientists are not convicted.
4 comments

And then out with a quick whimper that the scientists are not convicted.

Well, no, this isn't Italy.

I think op is referring to a TS Elliot poem
Whereas GP is making reference to a case in which Italian seismologists were literally convicted after their predictions did not come true.
This is the way the world ends

This is the way the world ends

This is the way the world ends

Not with a bang but a whimper.

---

Excerpt from The Hollow Men by T.S. Eliot[0].

I'll have to add it to the page, but it was also used as the introduction for The Compound by S.A. Bodeen[1]. It's an interesting young adult novel about a family living underground in a state of the art bomb shelter after a nuclear attack occurs.

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hollow_Men

[1] https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-compound-s-a-bodeen/1554853...

We would also have accepted, "The best lack all conviction / While the worst are filled with passionate intensity." Even though that's Yeats.
Actually, I think the reference might be to this:

https://www.theverge.com/2014/11/11/7193391/italy-judges-cle...

Convinced? :-)
Likely what they meant, but convicted could be correct here, in that the scientists may not have much conviction in their assessment, i.e. do not feel certain.
Didn't happen in the last five days either. Does that make it more likely or less?
I’m an independent statistic who don’t need no covariant!
Um, no. Right from the start of the article it was clear this was a relatively small, periodic family of earthquakes, nothing like "the big one".