|
|
|
|
|
by JumpCrisscross
803 days ago
|
|
> the vigiles was that they were under the direct command of centurions, despite being largely slaves, and were organized into barracks I've had difficulty determining if these were military centurions, or a broader use of the term. Also realised: it’s uniquely difficult to draw a civil-military distinction in ancient Rome given how they thought about leadership--a good politician was a good general and vice versa. Within that context, given they were a mix of slaves and freedmen, had short life expectancies and were lightly armed [1], arguing they were more military than civil is like saying our police are military on the sole basis of being commanded by seargeants. > must not accept that the police as they exist today are the only way policing can be done Agree. A lot of things we administer today, on the other hand, were never publicly administered. Like mental health. [1] https://novelsofcolinhough.wordpress.com/2021/03/27/the-vigi... |
|
I still think the vigiles are probably notably quite different from police - operating mostly at night, being able to move directly into the military, sleeping in a barracks. Much of the policing during the day was carried out by cohortes urbanae, which definitely were military units.
But they were an organized firefighting and policing force (and I haven't been able to find information on whether they were uniformed). I can see the resemblance, but they also existed in Rome for 300 years then disappeared.