[klabb3]

Isn’t the issue more that off-the-shelf solutions optimize for features and not cost? For instance, if I sell you an observability product, I want to show off all the cool realtime debugging features and such. And since there’s a cost to having all these features available (retention, indexing, sampling), we end up paying for features we don’t need. In a world of usage-based XaaS, there’s very little incentive to be cost-effective. Arguably even a perverse incentive to waste resources.

I bet you a full dollar that both in-house and open source solutions, on average, are way more stingy with resources. As they should be.

[ChrisCooney]

Hey! Just wanna wave a flag for Coralogix (I work there, disclaimer). We've built a ton of cost optimization because we know that the industry is just ridiculous right now. Your assessment is absolutely correct, and there are more than a few multi-billion dollar companies whose bottom line is predicated on their customers wasting money and being inefficient. We're not one of them!

https://coralogix.com/