|
|
|
|
|
by shinypokemon
796 days ago
|
|
(Neon DevRel) Hey, we do want to add numbers back to that page. The issue was that the original numbers were inaccurate. "The goal of this metric is to represent the health of a system. However, we found this binary “is there an incident or not” approach wasn’t accurate for describing our service. For example, in the past 30 days, 99.9% of projects hosted on Neon had an uptime better than 99.95%; however, the status page displayed 99.89% uptime." (source: https://neon.tech/blog/multi-tenant-uptime) |
|
How many times do you expect to slice it? "For 99% of days this year, 99% of our customers have experienced 99% reliability for 99% of their users, we're 99% sure"? (That's just the long way of saying 95%)