|
|
|
|
|
|
by TMWNN
789 days ago
|
|
|
>Eich used his wealth to lobby for something that many people find objectionable. Something which a majority of Californians in 2008 voted for, so your many people were the minority. But even were that not the case, where should the line be drawn? Even if Eich's view were held by 1% and not the 52.24% that voted for it in 2008, should Eich have been fired for holding that position? Yes or no? |
|
|