|
|
|
|
|
by askvictor
795 days ago
|
|
I suspect it was intentionally trying to be free from any association/baggage connected to traditional time. Since the 'beat' time has no relation to anything physical/relate-able other than day-length, why bother keeping the baggage of UTC? |
|
If the time had been entirely separate or arbitrary that argument would hold, but the time was a normal "24 hour clock" that synced up to the standard day rotation, but centered on Zurich.
Because of that, the choice not to use UTC, but instead to UTC+1 meant that to do a calculation of UTC, which is the standard time measurement for earth, you had to subtract 41.6 beats, which was silly.