|
|
|
|
|
by raverbashing
5146 days ago
|
|
Forgetting for a moment all the theory of color and contrast /equilibrium in a design: 1 - different people see different shades (difference in monitors) 2 - Unless there is a glaring problem with the shade of color chosen (like something most designers wouldn't approve), changing shades is one of the least important areas of improvement possible 3 - The current redesigns of GMail / G+ / GReader (among others) are very showing that Google is thinking like "engineers" and not like UX experts |
|
(2) This is where it becomes tricky. You have to understand that these decisions are made at a very local level by small teams with specific goals(for example, "bump revenue from sidebar links by x%"). Also, it is unrealistic to suggest that a company the size of google can only work on super big items when at Google's volume, small improvements can add up and result in hundreds of millions in additional revenue.
(3) Not a fan of the new gmail but using their blue shade experiment as supporting evidence for why their design sucks isn't very powerful.