|
|
|
|
|
|
by Royce-CMR
793 days ago
|
|
|
Yep. The key words are: to you.
When I have convos about this, a spectrum of views come out. Other views I’ve heard: - pausing encourages ad hoc crossing, increasing odds of hurting someone by volume even as odds decrease. - if you stop you enable carjacking (walk into street, car stops, steal car / hurt the human, profit). I don’t want my car to set my loved ones up to be attacked. - pausing significantly impacts traffic flow, compressing our already overcrowded roads - I don’t want the car to stop unless it gets to my destination, there’s a red light, or I tell it to stop. I don’t want behavior I might not understand. I’ll decide if I stop for a human or puppy or cardboard box. Everyone says human safety first but in practice there’s a spectrum of opinions in practice. My hope is FSD will force a common viewpoint and setup a future generation with a more unified approach to road safety. |
|
|