|
|
|
|
|
|
by Rinzler89
801 days ago
|
|
|
>You can not look at the 4 Billion in losses while ignoring European laws. What does the loss and being terrible at selling cars have to do with EU laws? EU laws didn't make them be shit. >And? Mercedes lost exactly the same amount of money the Chinese did. In no way is this more of a loss for China than it is for Germany. How would the Chinese have lot money if Daimler lost that money before they entered the partnership with Geely? >f you consider as an output of the car industry also the social benefits The social benefit of making Diesel cars that reduce years of our lifespan thanks to air pollution, but at least they're a great place to work? With that logic the war in Ucraine is also a social benefits since it creates places to work. |
|
|
Do you just not understand how EU car regulations work? Otherwise I think you would understand why the 4 Billion loss is something Mercedes is happy to accept. Because it simply isn't a 4 Billion dollar loss.
>How would the Chinese have lot money if Daimler lost that money before they entered the partnership with Geely?
It's been 5 years since the partnership. The company isn't even called Daimler anymore and if they aren't loosing money now...
>but at least they're a great place to work?
Yes. Also people can go wherever they want whenever they want, which is another great benefit. Enormous benefits all together, which is why China is so keen on building cars.