|
|
|
|
|
by dcow
800 days ago
|
|
These tools typically claim to block or catch stupidly high number of threats per unit time. And they usually bucket the drive-by stuff as a threat to achieve this narrative. I agree it’s hogwash. So you’re essentially admitting that these TLS boxes are more about controlling employees and “data loss prevention” than actually preventing real threats and doing honest security. Got it. https://honest.security |
|
I think the parent commenter was pointing out that "MITM TLS box" has nothing to do with sshd scans. Not that MITM TLS boxes have no use.
Oh, and #4 on that "tenets of honest security" is an opinion not shared by all.
In the modern era of guest wifi and ubiquitous personal mobile devices, personal use on a work machine is not necessary or advisable. That said, in most places it is common to *not* decrypt websites related to health and government and banking.
Everything is about liability and protection of company data.