| It was a demo on how to use the tool. Would you like to learn how to? Try the following steps to construct a prompt on Claude Opus: 1. Type in "I saw this comment on Hacker News:" 2. Hit `>` to start a blockquote. 3. Paste in my entire previous comment 4. Type in "Is this person saying that we should copy-and-paste LLM output as comments to others? Could you explain what he is suggesting I should do if I misunderstand?" 5. Hit Enter I just tried it and the explanation is right on the money. Not everyone can pick up on human language well, even if they're skilled at other stuff. You can repeat that with the original sequence of comments as well. 0. Type in "I saw this sequence of Hacker News comments:" 1. Paste in Arrakeen's comment in a blockquote starting with "FWIW I agree with you" 2. Create a nested blockquote with the next response '"Flagship" means important.' 3. Create a third level of nesting with the next response Ford's battery "Important" 4. Exit the nesting and ask: "Does it appear that these people understand what "Ford's battery flagship" means or are they confused by the term?" And it will correctly detect that they were confused as they said: > FWIW I agree with you. The title hardly makes sense to me as well.
"Ford's Battery Flagship" - even after reading the article I'm still not sure what this is. See, he does not know what it means, but if he had asked a high-powered LLM it would immediately have gotten him there and saved him some time commenting. And it looks like you could have too! It's really pretty good stuff. Thanks for working on them. |