Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by xcv123 796 days ago
> would be interesting to see the data and be proven wrong!

Here's some data

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_MAX#Accidents_and_i...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40010992

1 comments

Ok, now let's see some data denominated by number of flight hours.
LOL. Imagine having multiple whistleblowers telling you about widespread criminal negligence at Boeing manufacturing facilities, then all you say is "Ok, now let's see some data". The fucking clowns on this site. LOL.
This is called a "strawman argument."

"Widespread criminal negligence" or not, these incidents are mathematically insignificant using highschool-level statistical analyses.

No it's not a strawman argument. You are missing the point. The article is about a whistleblower reporting criminal negligence at Boeing. It is not a statistical report. Statistics are irrelevant here. However if you want some recent Boeing stats then look at the 737 Max. Two complete losses within two years of its introduction. You must have been living in a cave to not hear about that.

From the article.

"In a virtual meeting with reporters, Salehpour said Boeing was so eager to meet its production goals that it took "shortcuts" when it fastened together the carbon-composite fuselage of the 787. That could dramatically shorten the life of the plane, he warned, potentially causing it to break apart in mid-flight."