[SPBS]

> it's also getting close to two decades old if I remember correctly. Any large C or C++ project that is that old is going to have quite a bit of historical cruft.

I don't think writing arbitrary data into fixed-size buffer without boundary checks is just an artifact of being historical cruft, it's a ridiculous mistake no matter which time period it was written in. Whoever wrote that code decades ago was incredibly amateurish.

[smsm42]

That assuming the code was written that way initially. More often than not in long running projects pieces get moved around, refactored, functionality added and removed, and silent assumptions that were true before aren't true anymore. Somebody coded functionality for fixed data buffer, somebody else extended it with variable sized data but was not aware fixed buffers are being used, that stuff happens. We live in a myriad of glass castles, don't be so quick to throw stones around.

[PedroBatista]

The tone of some comments like this one makes me wonder if the authors ever wrote any software of reasonable complexity, on their free time while getting paid zero dollars.

With such high standards I wonder why this people use such amateur software and not make or buy their own professional grade software.

Also sheds light why truly free open source software is such a thankless and hazardous activity