|
|
|
|
|
by eviks
803 days ago
|
|
> because otherwise that info for all features had to be on screen and there’s only so much space on it. there's practically infinite space on screen since that space has a time dimension and can also be tied to context which also varies. Like with this feature: you can show a tip on the first few searches within a list, you don't need to permanently keep the explanation on screen. Or you can show a hint with ll by having a different style of the second l or something similar Undiscoverability is precisely one big reason why these things get axed since they're not used, so forgotten about in other contexts (web, new UI framework etc) And yes, needing to reading random articles like this is a major fail in discoverability as you decrease reach and increase cost for the many poor users |
|
And while we are at it, "lack of use" is not a good reason to axe features. Some things, by their nature, just don't get used as much but when they are needed they are needed. Product designers have become slaves to their telemetry and metrics, and are letting the tail wag the dog.