|
|
|
|
|
by deathanatos
802 days ago
|
|
There's an RFC that specifies a standard format for CSV. If you're smart you'd use it ^W^W… well, you'd probably not use CSV to start with. The problem is that often, what you have to ingest is more properly described as "malformed CSV / bytes that loosely resembled CSV in some manner that I have no choice but to either try to shove into a parser, or write some custom junk for this hot garbage because it comes form a source that I cannot control". A lot of parsers are fairly configurable precisely to account for the situation of "the other end is sending me ill-defined jank" and to be flexible enough that maybe, just maybe, it'll mostly work. But it's hardly "engineering" at that point. |
|
It describes a common format.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4180