|
|
|
|
|
by lxgr
807 days ago
|
|
asm.js was the opposite of an alternative to JavaScript: It was a performant JavaScript dialect used as a compilation target for various languages otherwise targeting emscripten. WASM is the spiritual successor to that, getting rid of the (in retrospect quite hilarious) "embedded backwards compatibility layer". |
|
edit: for the record, I think having only one doc type (html) and only one scripting language (js) in the browser is a terrible idea.
I don't know what the other doc types and programming languages should be but performance alone seems like a poor idea. A compile target seems even worse. :)