|
|
|
|
|
|
by markus_zhang
805 days ago
|
|
|
Thanks. It looks complicated. I'm learning Windows desktop development and will take a look of QT first. I used it for a small project years ago and the experience was OK. > 1. A standard way to define components that is statically reflectable (so you can populate property and event editors), and get documentation on the fly, etc. This was what I really loved about Visual Basic back in the day. Everything is within clicks -- even with the legacy IDE it still feels slick. |
|
|