| NB. Although the paper appears in "Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law", none of the authors are lawyers. SSRN is pathetic as a source for papers, IMHO. Quality control is nonexistent. Even something simple like the URL for Shaoor Munir's website is incorrect. The "a href" is http://https//. This is a PhD candidate in Computer Science. In the paper itself,1 Shuba is listed as "independent researcher". Her website states "independent researcher by night". It would not make sense to list DuckDuckGo as the affiliated organisation as she is doing the work on her own time. Arguably her website should be listed though, so readers can discover that she works there during the day. Here is an example of SSRN's quality control: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4576722 The SSRN paper submission instructions appear to make it mandatory to submit an affiliation. The reality is that we could list our dogs as a co-authors and SSRN would accept the paper. SSRN is just plain annoying. The website tries to force people into enabling Javascript just to download a PDF. That is totally unnecessary. Look at arxiv.org. 1. https://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~zubair/files/jetlaw-chrome-antit...
(No Javascript needed) |