Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by gcanko 795 days ago
It's exactly like the invention of agriculture. Not having to hunt for food gave more opportunities for intellectual pursuits because of having more free time.
2 comments

I'm skeptical of this argument. It gave free time to some people i.e. the landed gentry but also created the toiling peasants and a hierarchical civilization.
Many other types of governance was enabled by the agricultural revolution, not just feudalism.
Toiling peasants had more free time than we do today.
As I understand it, this is largely inaccurate. People just read "days off" as "more time", even though peasant farmers would need to engage in a lot of labor around the farm or household even on "days off" (your cows and chickens don't care that you're on vacation).

Of course people still do some chores today even on days off, but it's a lot less than you need to do on a farm, ask basically any farmer.

The amount of toiling they could do without dying was calorically limited. Having lethargy induced by a shortage of food doesn’t necessarily mean a preferable lifestyle.
Hunter gatherers had more leisure than farming peasants. Surely, one can spot the trend.
[citation needed]
"Who's going to teach those idle medieval peasants to read, Ben? Augustine-man?!"
Pfft, disagree. Got laid off a year ago and have had nearly 100% free time since
No, it just meant you could support more people on the same amount of land. Non-mechanised agriculture is very labour-intensive compared to hunting.