|
|
|
|
|
|
by karma_pharmer
808 days ago
|
|
|
unless you’re stating crypto primitives should only be written in assembly Yes, that's exactly what I'm stating. Have a look at openssl, boringssl, nspr, etc. They all implement the core modular arithmetic for RSA and the s-box table for AES using assembly language. There is no reliable way to prevent a C compiler from "optimizing" your constant-time code into non-constant-time code. another rust TLS implementation rustls uses assembler (from boringssl) for these routines. It is not 100% rust, and that's a good thing. |
|
|