|
|
|
|
|
|
by willis936
810 days ago
|
|
|
Sure but the article asks the question about the frequency domain generally then constrains itself to Fourier transforms. Fourier has a lot of baggage from making large assumptions. Transforms like wavelet and laplace are closer to "real world" because of fewer non-physical assumptions and have actual physical implementations. It doesn't get much more real than seeing it with your own eyes. |
|
|
Could you expand on this a bit please? Especially as it relates to the Laplace transform.