|
|
|
|
|
by Eager
811 days ago
|
|
Open weights is one thing, but we don't even have that with OpenAI at least. Even then, open weights is like me checking in a .exe and acting surprised if people look at me funny. I'm definitely in the camp where all the artefacts are provided along with fully reproducible build and test environment for anyone who wants to retrace the steps. Whatever 'open' means, I don't think it is eight shell companies, not even weights provided and closely guarded secrets around how RLHF, alignment and safety testing is carried out. In fact, you would think that being 'open' about at least alignment and safety testing procedures would be the least one could expect. I do understand that revealing these things may disclose zero day exploits for bad actors, but on the other hand, being open for inspection is how things get fixed, and I've never been a fan of security through obscurity. |
|