[thedookmaster]

> We were made aware that a single user of the AI platform was purportedly provided an image that did not adhere to the built-in parameters set by the developers.

I laughed at this. What a non-apology with no accountability.

[panda-giddiness]

That's the quote that stuck out to me, too. It's like they're insinuating that the person is lying (while elsewhere admitting they don't have evidence either way). I mean, I don't want to backseat-quarterback here, but would it have been so hard to say something like, "We have decided to take our website offline while we investigate a report that our website generated an inappropriate image of a user"?